The former disgraced DNC chair Wasserman-Schultz is part of a suit, claiming she and others rigged the primary, trashing Bernie and securing the win for Hillary. Since the summer of last year, a group of people who supported the campaign for Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., have been waging a legal battle against the DNC for alleged fraud, claiming the DNC and then-chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz worked to undermine Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton.A federal judge has gone on record stating that Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary Clinton and the DNC committed fraud during the primary elections, before throwing the case out of court because the fraudsters are above the law. DNC bylaws say the chair must remain neutral during an election, so a pair of Miami lawyers, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, sued the DNC and former chair Wasserman Schultz in federal court, claiming on behalf of more than 100 people that the congresswoman had committed fraud against Bernie Sanders donors by rigging the primary for Clinton. After months of hearings, Judge William Zloch, a Regan appointee, stated that Jared and Elizabeth Beck had proved their case – the DNC, led by Wasserman Schultz, committed fraud. But he threw the DNC Fraud Lawsuit out of court, writing that the plaintiffs had failed to prove their injury, calling it “too diffuse” for Federal court, and instructing Sanders donors to pursue justice from within the Democratic National Committee, not the law courts. The extraordinary verdict has left legal experts reeling. For months they have been claiming it was an open and shut case. Article 5, Section 4 of the DNC Charter, also known as the Impartiality Clause, reads as follows: “the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.” Earlier this year, lawyers representing the DNC astoundingly argued that the committee was not bound by law to hold fair elections, a claim that — while potentially true — lifted the lid on the deep-seated corruption at the heart of the party.